This page is obsolete. It is kept here for archival purposes, but for an up-to-date version please see the DigiPal Framework wiki on GitHub at https://github.com/kcl-ddh/digipal/wiki/.

Introduction

show simplified diagram
explain what a data model is why it is useful to know the DigiPal model: general understanding of our conceptualisation, admin interface, API, developers (relational database).
briefly mention its roots (Legacy database, Blog discussion and FRBR)
explain that it was originally designed for manuscript and handwriting but more general than that (e.g. coins and decorations)

The Item and its Parts

The Item is central to the DigiPal database. Essentially, an Item corresponds to a physical object such as a manuscript book. Item here draws on the definition from FRBR:

The entity defined as item is a concrete entity. It is in many instances a single physical object (e.g., a copy of a one-volume monograph, a single audio cassette, etc.). There are instances, however, where the entity defined as item comprises more than one physical object (e.g., a monograph issued as two separately bound volumes, a recording issued on three separate compact discs, etc.). (FRBR Section 3.2.4)

In a historical context, however, the single physical object is often not stable: a book may have been broken into parts, parts of one book bound with those from another, and so on. For this reason we distinguish between the HistoricalItem and the CurrentItem. The Current Item is defined to be the object as it exists today, as defined by the library or archive in which it is preserved. In short, it is what you ask for if you go to the library and want to see it. In contrast, the Historical Item corresponds to the object as it was at some point in the past. Often this will correspond to a catalogue entry, and in general the HistoricalItem is the one that we are interested in. The Item Part is then the maximum possible unit that allows us to map from HistoricalItem to Current Item. It is similar to the 'codicological unit' as defined in Muzerelle's Vocabulaire Codicologique but corresponds more to what was or is bound together now, rather than what may or may not have been produced at the same time.

The simplest example is a book which still today takes essentially the same form that it did when it was first produced. In this case there will be one Current Item record describing its current location, one Historical Item record containing the details of its production, and one Item Part to join them together. An example is Antwerp, Plaintin-Moretus Museum M.16.2 (the Current Item), which contains a copy of Boethius' De Consolatione attributed tentatively to Abingdon (the Historical Item).

A more complex example is Cambridge, Corpus Christi College MSS 162 and 178. Originally there were three manuscripts: one book of homilies and related material (Gneuss No. 50), a manuscript containing Ælfric's Hexameron and other works (Gneuss no. 54), and a bilingual Rule of St Benedict (Gneuss No. 55). These three are therefore Historical Items. However, the second of the three was split into two parts. One part was bound with the bilingual Rule, and the other part was inserted into the middle of the homiletic volume. We therefore have two volumes today, CCCC 162 and CCCC 178. These are both Current Items, insofar as they each form distinct volumes and can be request as such from the library today. There are also four distinct codicological units – the homiletic volume, the Rule, and the two parts of the Hexameron – and these in turn correspond to Item Parts. In summary, then, there are:

Two Current Items: CCCC 162 and CCCC 178
Three Historical Items: CCCC 162 pp. 1–138 and 161–564; CCCC 178 pp. 1–270 + CCCC 162 pp. 139–60; and CCCC 178, pp. 287–457
Four Item Parts: CCCC 162, pp. 1–138; CCCC 162, pp. 161–564; CCCC 178, pp. 1–270, and CCCC 178, pp. 287–457

This is represented in the following diagram:

[Add complications re. ScandiPal model]

The Hand and Scribe

Hand in DigiPal essentially refers to a single specimen of writing contained within a single Item Part. It therefore approximately corresponds to a stint but implies no assumptions about whether or not a given specimen was produced in a single campaign. A Hand is also assumed to have been written in a given Script: although it may include allographs from a different script, it is assumed that a single primary script can be identified.

This leads to two important points: first, that if an Item contains writing in two different Scripts, then this writing corresponds to two different Hands, one for each Script. Second, if two different Item Parts contain writing by the same Scribe then these are still counted as two different Hands, even if the two parts were originally written as a single volume.

A Scribe represents the person who wrote the Hands, i.e. who produced the specimens of writing. In practice the Scribe links different Hands from different Item Parts or Scripts in the same Historical Item, as well as across different Historical items.

Note that a Hand and a Scribe are both associated with a date and place. This is to accommodate the mobility of scribes (e.g. a scribe can be primarily associated with a given location but may have written a particular Hand somewhere else), and also to allow a chronology of a scribe's work during his or her lifetime.